As a writer, it’s natural to have writer’s block at one time or another.
Now is one of those times.
After starting this piece about five different times with five completely different topic ideas, I decided to go with the only thing that I could write about: not writing.
It’s not that I don’t have anything to write about. I have much to write about. What I don’t have is a good writing practice — a committed discipline — and without that, my writing is subject to my moods and the unscheduled time slots in my calendar (between the hours of 12am and 6am). I need to cultivate the practice of placing butt in chair to write whether I feel like it or not — rain or shine, inspired or stymied, happy or cranky.
My most developed writing ritual is procrastination. I tend to find ways to procrastinate until the pressure I put myself under gets really unpleasant. I do a lot of web “research.” I think about the logistics of my writing rather than the content. I fret about the fact that I didn’t schedule writing time in my calendar, or if I did, I used the time for something else. I go grocery shopping. I do laundry. I even pay bills — another activity I procrastinate religiously, unless of course I end up doing it as a way to procrastinate the writing.
How long can I write about not writing? Isn’t that an act of procrastination?
I could write about how I brought my laptop with me to the couch with the intention of sitting comfortably and writing but fell asleep instead. This is what happens when you start a writing session after midnight, after a fabulous dinner with friends that included a couple of bottles of wine. I could write about how much bill-paying I completed, or how many new photos of my baby nephew I added to my growing digital collection. I could write about how I learned that actor Ed Norton dated singer Courtney Love from 1996 to 1999. Finally, I could write about how I viewed the online galleries of all the photographers I used to work for in the 1980’s after compulsively Googling them for the first time ever… when I was supposed to be writing. I guess I thought I might write about them. I guess I just did, so in retrospect it was web research.
Did you know that “ok” first showed up in 1839 as an abbreviation for a deliberate misspelling, “oll korrect?” It was the vestige of a slang fad in New York and Boston. Should you care to question the source of this random piece of information, according to the Chicago Manual Style (CMS), the proper way to cite it is:
o. k.. Dictionary.com. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/o. k. (accessed: April 18, 2011)
I think I just have to accept that this piece will not be what I had originally intended. It will end without me writing about anything substantive that I experienced before this bout of writer’s block. It will be disjointed and self-indulgent. It will end without much logic or warning.












